Case 1405057/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Dr J Park, Managing Director of the Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405057/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Vernon Smeed brought monetary claims against DongBang AcuPrime Limited for unlawful deduction from wages, including accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The holiday pay claim was met by the respondent before judgment and was withdrawn; the tribunal recorded it as dismissed on withdrawal.
The remaining issue was the deduction from the claimant’s July 2020 salary. The parties agreed that gross salary of £1,843.45 was due for the period 1 July to 23 July 2020, and that the respondent had not paid it in full. The tribunal accepted that, after the claimant was suspended on 15 July 2020, he failed to hand over the respondent’s phone, laptop, passwords and related IT access as instructed, and that the respondent incurred additional cost in trying to recover commercially valuable contacts, files and emails.
The tribunal found that clause 9(c) of the claimant’s contract permitted deductions for losses caused by dishonesty, carelessness, negligence, recklessness or breach of policies or procedures. It accepted that the respondent was entitled to deduct the £1,320.00 invoice from Acronyms Ltd for specialist IT recovery work, but it rejected the respondent’s attempt to deduct the time spent by its own employees in trying to resolve the issue. After that deduction, £523.45 remained due to the claimant and had been unlawfully deducted from his wages.
The claim for unlawful deduction from wages therefore succeeded in part, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £523.45 gross. No separate remedy was awarded for the withdrawn holiday pay claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant’s accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim was met by the respondent and withdrawn; the judgment records it as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent was entitled under clause 9(c) of the contract to deduct £1,320.00 for Acronyms Ltd’s IT recovery costs from the agreed July 2020 wages of £1,843.45, leaving £523.45 unpaid and unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £523 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £523
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.