Case 1405073/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Yates v Alexander Duval — 2023
- Case reference
- 1405073/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Yates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 30 August 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Roper Date decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr C Yates £9,714.07 gross.
The judgment records that the respondent must pay £9,714.07 in total. The hearing listed for 9 February 2024 at 10:00 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £9,714.07 gross. No separate per-claim breakdown was given. | Upheld | — | £9,714 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,714
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.