Case 1405074/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the First v The Insolvency Service — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405074/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints for arrears of wages and holiday pay after his employment as Operations Manager with the Second Respondent ended on 26 July 2023. He said that he was owed 47 days of unpaid sums, and at the hearing he confirmed the figures claimed. The First Respondent resisted liability on the basis that Fat Toni's (Stroud) Limited had entered a CVA on 19 September 2019 and later a CVL on 4 August 2023, so the relevant insolvency date for National Insurance Fund purposes was the CVA date.
The tribunal explained that, for claims under ss.166 and 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant had to show that the arrears of pay and holiday pay were unpaid at the 'appropriate date' under s.185. It applied Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v McDonagh and ors, holding that where a company first enters a CVA and is later wound up, the first insolvency date is the relevant date and there is not a second appropriate date when liquidation follows. The claimant did not dispute the legal analysis and accepted that the only judgment that could be made on that issue was against the Second Respondent.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the complaints against the First and Third Respondents. It then entered judgment against the Second Respondent for the sums claimed: £3,775 gross for arrears of wages, calculated as 302 hours at £12.50 per hour, and £3,322 gross for accrued but untaken holiday, calculated as 22 days at £151 per day. The bottom-line award was £7,097.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross arrears of wages awarded against the Second Respondent only; the tribunal calculated this as 302 hours at £12.50 per hour. The complaints against the First and Third Respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £3,775 |
| Holiday pay | Gross accrued but untaken holiday pay awarded against the Second Respondent only; the tribunal calculated this as 22 days at £151 per day. The complaints against the First and Third Respondents were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £3,322 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,097
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.185(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 appropriate date
- Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v McDonagh and ors [2013] ICR 1177
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.