Case 1405122/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Hart v Swindon domestic cleaning LTD, t/a Merrymaids — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405122/2023
- Decision date
- 16 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Hart
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimant, Miss R Hart, against Swindon Domestic Cleaning Ltd t/a Merrymaids. The judgment determined that the claimant is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,475, calculated as 16.5 weeks at £150.00 gross per week.
The tribunal also held that the claimant's claim for breach of contract succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay nine weeks' notice pay, representing the balance due of her eleven weeks' statutory notice, in the sum of £1,350.00.
The judgment was made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 by Employment Judge Roper, dated 30 May 2024, and sent to the parties on 16 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £2,475 (16.5 weeks at £150.00 gross per week). | Upheld | — | £2,475 |
| Breach of contract | Nine weeks' notice pay (balance of eleven weeks' statutory notice) at £150.00 per week, totalling £1,350.00. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,825
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.