Case 1405182/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Hieron v Construction Site Scaffolding Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1405182/2018
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Hieron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 14 and 15 October 2019 before Employment Judge J Bax. The claimant was Mr I Hieron and the respondent was Construction Site Scaffolding Limited. The written record identifies the representation for each side but does not set out any detailed factual findings in the body of the judgment.
The judgment records that the claims of unfair dismissal/constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract did not succeed and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision. The note at the end states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual process.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment groups this with constructive unfair dismissal and states that the claims did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The written judgment groups this with unfair dismissal and states that the claims did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in the same written judgment as the dismissal claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.