Case 1405207/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Place v Anaya Corporation Ltd t/a Kare Plus Portsmouth — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405207/2018
- Decision date
- 2 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Place
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 5 December 2019, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out because it had not complied with the Tribunal's orders. The respondent did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the response under rule 37. The judgment states that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive finding on the underlying claim or any monetary remedy is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | This judgment strikes out the respondent's response under rule 37 for failure to comply with tribunal orders. It does not determine the merits of the underlying public interest disclosure claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.