Case 1405231/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hewlett in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405231/2023
- Decision date
- 16 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hogarth Christine
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Christine Lloyd-Jennings, Christine Earwaker
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Hewlett in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Southampton on 25, 26, 27 and 28 November 2023 before Employment Judge Hogarth, with lay members Christine Lloyd-Jennings and Christine Earwaker. The claimant, Mr S P Hewlett, appeared in person and the respondent, Southern Water Services Ltd, was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the tribunal reached a unanimous decision.
The tribunal dismissed both claims before it. The claim for unfair dismissal was found not well-founded and dismissed, and the claim for discrimination arising from disability was also found not well-founded and dismissed. The record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the decision record, so the published document contains the outcomes but not the tribunal's fuller reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.