Case 1405237/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms A Smith — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405237/2020
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at VHS on 21 and 22 February 2022 before Employment Judge Gray, recorded that Mr S Barry's complaint of direct age discrimination against SIG Trading Limited failed and was dismissed. The supplied written judgment does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons, but it states that those reasons were given at the hearing.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint failed and was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision, and the note at the end states that written reasons would not be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The written record states that the claimant's complaint of direct age discrimination failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the unfair dismissal complaint failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.