Case 1405240/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B. Knight v Havant and South Downs College — 2025
- Case reference
- 1405240/2023
- Decision date
- 19 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Le Grys
- Panel members
- Mr L. Wakeman, Dr N. Thornback
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B. Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs B. Knight brought a victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 arising from a police report made on 10 May 2023 about her LinkedIn posts. The tribunal accepted that the acts relied on were protected acts, but found that the report was made by Leona Berry personally, using her own device and contact details, after she had become exasperated by posts that she understood to be directed at her and her professional reputation.
The tribunal accepted that Ms Berry was not directly involved in the earlier employment dispute, had not been personally responsible for the racial harassment found in the previous proceedings, and had not been acting at the College's direction when she reported the matter. It also rejected the suggestion that the College had encouraged or supported her to do so. Applying the former-employee provisions in section 108 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal held that the report was not closely connected to the past employment relationship and, in any event, Ms Berry was not acting in the course of her employment.
The tribunal noted that the police took no further action and that the claimant was not investigated, charged or cautioned. It accepted, however, that a report to police of this kind was capable of amounting to a detriment. The claim nonetheless failed because the tribunal found that the report was prompted by Ms Berry's personal reaction to what she saw as harassment and false statements about her, rather than because the claimant had done protected acts. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The complaint concerned a police report made on 10 May 2023 about the claimant's LinkedIn posts. The tribunal found that the report was made by Ms Berry in a personal capacity, not on behalf of the College, and was not closely connected to the past employment relationship. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- Onu v Akwiwu; Taiwo v Olaigbe
- s.108(1)(a) and (b) Equality Act 2010
- Tiplady v City of Bradford
- Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary
- Coutinho v Rank Nemo (DMS) Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.