Case 1405257/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Marshall v Aldi Stores Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405257/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing before Employment Judge J Bax concerned the Respondent's application to strike out the claims, with an application for deposit orders in the alternative.
The Tribunal dismissed the application. It recorded that all claims shall proceed to a final hearing. No written reasons were provided in the judgment because reasons had been given orally, subject to any request for written reasons within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment did not determine the unfair dismissal claim on its merits; it dismissed the Respondent's application to strike out the claims and for deposit orders in the alternative, and directed that all claims proceed to a final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment did not determine the disability discrimination claim on its merits; it dismissed the Respondent's application to strike out the claims and for deposit orders in the alternative, and directed that all claims proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.