Case 1405262/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Whitmore v Keith Grose — 2025
- Case reference
- 1405262/2023
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Whitmore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy email dated 18 March 2025, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. It noted that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. This judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment deals only with the respondent's response being struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not determine the underlying substantive claims on their merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.