Case 1405281/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Kuleta v R&E Kitchen Care Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1405281/2021
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr L Wakeman, Mr P Bompas
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Kuleta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Southampton on 9 and 10 May 2023 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke, with Mr L Wakeman and Mr P Bompas sitting as lay members. The Claimant was represented by Mr J Nicholson of Southampton Advice and Representation Centre, and the Respondent by Mr C McDevitt, counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s automatic unfair dismissal claim on grounds of health and safety was dismissed by way of withdrawal. It also recorded that the Claimant’s discrimination claims, namely discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments, failed and were dismissed.
No written reasons were provided in the judgment record because reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes only the disposal of the claims. The judgment does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal on grounds of health and safety; the judgment records that it was dismissed by way of withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.