Case 1405298/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Joanne Bell v AND Sussex clubs for Young People Limited (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405298/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Joanne Bell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. Miss Joanne Bell’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered Sussex Clubs for Young People Limited (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) to pay her expenses of £179.20.
The claimant’s separate breach of contract claim, which concerned notice pay, was withdrawn by the claimant and is recorded in the judgment as dismissed on that basis. No further findings on the merits of that claim, and no separate compensation breakdown, are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal, sitting under Rule 21 because no valid response was presented, upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay expenses of £179.20. | Upheld | — | £179 |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant; the judgment records it as dismissed on that basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £179
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.