Case 1405299/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Holt v Jarretts Motors Ltd T/A Wilmoths West — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405299/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Holt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Dawson found for the claimant, Miss E Holt, against Jarretts Motors Ltd T/A Wilmoths West. The tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment, and that her unfair dismissal claim was well founded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Remedy was left to a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. Remedy was left to a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the unfair dismissal claim was well founded. Remedy was left to a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.