Case 1405340/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P O’Callaghan, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405340/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P O’Callaghan, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal amended the claim to include allegations of detriment under s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 and automatic unfair dismissal under s103A Employment Rights Act 1996. It also extended time so those claims could proceed. The tribunal did not decide the merits of those whistleblowing allegations in this judgment.
The claimant's disability discrimination, race discrimination and unfair dismissal claims under s94 Employment Rights Act 1996 were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment therefore records no substantive liability findings on those claims and no monetary award.
The attached schedule dealt with amendment applications to individual incidents. Amendment was refused for the indirect discrimination allegation in incident 1, the March 2020 K Southern allegation in incident 2, and the allegations concerning the Porter and D McNair in incidents 5 and 6. For the L Hampton incidents on 9, 14 and 30 April 2020, some race-based amendments were allowed and the corresponding disability-based amendments were refused. The schedule records the procedural amendment rulings only and does not determine liability on the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal. The attached schedule records amendment decisions on individual disability-based incidents, but there was no merits determination in this judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal. The attached schedule records amendment decisions on individual race-based incidents, including some amendments allowed and some refused, but there was no merits determination in this judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal under s94 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | By consent, the claim was amended to include allegations of detriment under s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismissal under s103A Employment Rights Act 1996, and time was extended to allow those claims to proceed. No merits finding was made in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.