Mr C Glassey v Citrus FM Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1405349/2020
Decision date: 9 August 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Rayner Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Glassey

Respondent

Citrus FM Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 14 July 2021, the Tribunal gave Citrus FM Limited an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing explaining why its response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the response. The judgment records that the respondent would still be entitled to notice of any future hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.

The judgment does not determine the substantive employment claims on their merits and does not record any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not determine the underlying claims on the merits; it strikes out the respondent's response because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.