Case 1405448/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Liston v Concept Cleaning Solutions — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405448/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Liston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent did not enter a response. On that basis, it found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr R Liston's wages and ordered it to pay £433.82 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £220.92. No other claims, findings, or statutory tests are set out in the judgment text beyond the default judgment procedure.
The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Cadney Date on 21 July 2021 and sent to the parties on 02 August 2021. The combined monetary award on the face of the judgment is £654.74.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £434 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under Rule 21; tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £221 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £655
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.