Case 1405477/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Riley v Michele Tempest — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405477/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Riley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Bristol by video on 22 May 2024, before Employment Judge Livesey, the claimant, Miss S Riley, appeared in person and the respondent also appeared in person. The respondent’s name was amended by consent to Pulse Development (UK) Ltd.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims succeeded. It awarded £441 for unpaid holiday pay and £44.75 for unauthorised deductions from wages, making a total award of £485.75. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this as 'Unapid holiday pay', which appears to be a typo for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £441 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded £44.75 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £45 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £486
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.