Case 1405483/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Ali v First Greater Western Limited and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405483/2019
- Decision date
- 3 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr L Ali
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment records a withdrawal of certain parts of the claim rather than a final determination of all issues. The tribunal dismissed upon withdrawal all claims against the third respondent, the complaints under s.47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 concerning public interest disclosure detriment, and the complaints under s.146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act concerning trade union detriment.
The judgment states that the remaining complaints were to proceed to a further hearing in accordance with an order made the same day. It does not determine the merits of those remaining complaints or award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the complaints under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 (public interest disclosure detriment) were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Trade union | The judgment records that the complaints under s.146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (trade union detriment) were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.