Case 1405487/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Benjamin Jarvis v AND DX Network Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405487/2019
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Benjamin Jarvis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 3 January 2020 and, because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented, entered judgment under Rule 21. The judgment records that Mr Benjamin Jarvis was unfairly dismissed, that he was discriminated against on grounds of age, and that his claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded.
The tribunal also recorded that Mr Jarvis’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded. No separate findings of fact or reasoning are set out in the extracted text beyond the Rule 21 judgment, and no liability issue was left outstanding in the decision itself.
Remedy was not fixed in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the appropriate remedy would be determined at a later hearing, with notice to follow in due course.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.