Case 1405491/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Homebazaar UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405491/2019
- Decision date
- 14 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend and was not represented. After considering the available information, the tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The claimant succeeded in her claim for breach of contract and for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £841.50 gross, made up of a £76.50 one-day shortfall in notice pay and £765 for 10 days of accrued but unpaid holiday.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to give a written statement of particulars of employment and ordered payment of £612, equivalent to two weeks' pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award described as one day's pay shortfall in notice. | Upheld | — | £77 |
| Holiday pay | Award described as 10 days accrued but unpaid holiday at £76.50 per day. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Other | Award for failure to give a written statement of particulars of employment; classified as other because the locked taxonomy has no specific written particulars category. | Upheld | — | £612 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,454
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.