Case 1405493/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Peters v Star Linen Hire & Laundry Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405493/2023
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax. At
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Peters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied on 29 October 2024 for reconsideration of a judgment sent to the parties on 18 October 2024. The earlier reserved judgment had determined that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the claim was dismissed.
The tribunal considered the reconsideration application under rules 70 to 73 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. It recorded that the claimant raised points about the fairness of the preliminary hearing and sought a rehearing, but found that the hearing bundle issue had not been raised as making the hearing unfair at the time and that the remaining matters had already been raised and considered.
The tribunal concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of the judgment or any part of it being varied or revoked. The application for reconsideration was refused.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies sex discrimination. The reconsideration judgment records that the claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that an amendment to include constructive dismissal had been allowed at a preliminary hearing. The claim was dismissed on jurisdictional time-limit grounds. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 rules 70 to 73
- T.W. White & Sons Ltd v White
- Outasight VB Ltd v Brown
- Flint v Eastern Electricity Board
- Ministry of Justice v Burton
- Liddington v 2Gether NHS Foundation Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.