Case 1405515/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T J King v Kenn Herskind BS Forty Ltd t/a Winford Manor — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405515/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T J King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 May 2021, the Tribunal wrote to Mrs T J King and gave her an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type, and it records no merits findings.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not occur, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Cadney struck out the claim. The judgment and reasons were sent to the parties on 24 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the Tribunal's letter dated 18 May 2021 invited representations or a request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.