Case 1405537/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Doyle v Customate (Southern) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405537/2019
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs G Doyle was made redundant by Customate (Southern) Ltd on 19 September 2019. The respondent did not attend the hearing, which was conducted by telephone on 12 June 2020 before Employment Judge Rayner.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,443.75, calculated by reference to 5 weeks' pay at a gross weekly rate of £288.75. It also awarded 5 weeks' notice pay of £1,443.75 and 2 weeks' holiday pay of £577.50.
In addition, the tribunal made an award of 3 weeks' pay, £866.25, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. The total sum ordered to be paid to the claimant was £4,331.25.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,444 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as 5 weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,444 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as 2 weeks' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £578 |
| Other | Award of 3 weeks' pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £866 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,331
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.