Case 1405559/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Ojo v Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1405559/2023
- Decision date
- 5 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woodhead
- Venue
- in person at the Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms S Maidment, Mrs C Monaghan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Ojo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting with Employment Judge Woodhead and lay members Ms S Maidment and Mrs C Monaghan, gave a unanimous judgment that the claimant’s complaints of direct race discrimination, direct sex discrimination, and victimisation were not well-founded and were dismissed under sections 13 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010.
Because the complaints were not well-founded, the Tribunal did not go on to determine the questions of time limitation. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the decision record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.