Case 1405571/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405571/2023
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims including constructive unfair dismissal and holiday pay. The Tribunal recorded that the constructive unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it.
The Tribunal found the holiday pay claim well founded and upheld it. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £157.70 gross in respect of two days' holiday pay. Reasons were given orally, and the written judgment does not set out further findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was well founded and succeeds, with a gross award for two days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £158 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £158
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.