Case 1405585/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jones v Steve Porter Transport Ltd (In Administration) and The Secretary of State for Business and Trade (interested party) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405585/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaint that Steve Porter Transport Ltd failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr V Jones, was an employee at the respondent's premises at Dallimore House, Somerton Industrial Estate, Cowes, Isle of Wight, and that he was dismissed as redundant on or after 25 September 2023.
The tribunal made a protective award in respect of Mr Jones and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 25 September 2023. The extracted judgment does not state a separate monetary figure for the award, only the length of the protected period. The Secretary of State for Business and Trade is listed as an interested party.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal found the complaint that the Respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULRCA 1992 well founded and made a protective award. The extracted text states a protected period of 90 days beginning on 25 September 2023, but it does not state a monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.