Case 1405632/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nicholas Greenglass v AND Mr Stephen Lazarides (trading as Laz Emporium) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405632/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nicholas Greenglass
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21 in chambers at Plymouth on 26 February 2024 by Employment Judge N J Roper, the respondent having failed to present a valid response within the prescribed time. The tribunal therefore proceeded to judgment without a substantive hearing on the merits.
The claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a gross sum of £7,063.31, comprising £4,285.56 in unpaid wages and £2,777.75 in respect of pension deductions. The hearing previously listed for 22 March 2024 was cancelled in consequence.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment following no valid response. Award comprises £4,285.56 unpaid wages and £2,777.75 pension deductions, totalling £7,063.31 gross. The gov.uk listing also referenced breach of contract, but the judgment itself adjudicates only the unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £7,063 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,063
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.