Case 1405637/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Susan Perolls v AKS Forcort Limited and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405637/2020
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs Susan Perolls
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Susan Perolls had worked at All Saints Service Station since 16 June 2003. The tribunal found that the garage was subject to a service provision change when Tankerford Limited contracted first with AKS Forcort Limited in April 2020 and then with JMN Retail Limited. After refurbishment and closure in May 2020, the claimant was left unpaid for a period and tried to establish whether she still had a job.
The tribunal found that on 19 June 2020, when she met the incoming manager, she was told he would use his own staff and there was no place for her. It held that Mr Sithamparanathan's later refusal to answer her call, together with the surrounding events, amounted to dismissal by conduct on that date. Because the only reason advanced for not taking her on was that JMN Retail Limited refused to employ her, the dismissal was held to be automatically unfair under regulation 7(1) TUPE 2006. No economic, technical or organisational reason was suggested, and liability passed to JMN Retail Limited when the relevant transfer took effect on 1 July 2020.
Remedy was limited to compensation. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had made reasonable efforts to mitigate her loss until 8 March 2021, when her Jobseeker's Allowance ended, and it did not reduce the award for early pension drawdown. It rejected an ACAS uplift and the claimed loss of statutory and long-notice rights. The agreed and amended figures were £1,694.20 for unlawful deduction from wages, £4,691.64 for breach of contract or notice pay, £1,009.82 for holiday pay, a basic award of £12,034.98, and a compensatory award of £9,811.46, making a total of £29,242.10. For recoupment purposes, the protected period ran from 19 June 2020 to 18 March 2021 and the amount awarded in that period was £9,811.46.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair dismissal under regulation 7(1) TUPE 2006. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed on 19 June 2020 because the incoming manager would not take her on, and that liability passed to JMN Retail Limited on the 1 July 2020 transfer. | Upheld | — | £21,846 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract and quantified the notice pay element at £4,691.64; paragraph 50 labels this element as wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £4,692 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unpaid wages during the May 2020 shutdown period, as agreed between the parties and recorded in the remedy section. | Upheld | — | £1,694 |
| Holiday pay | Award for failure to pay holiday pay, contrary to regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,010 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,242
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £12,035
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,811
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) TUPE 2006
- regulation 4 TUPE 2006
- regulation 7(1) TUPE 2006
- ETO reason
- section 98 ERA 1996
- regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.