Case 1405646/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hamill v Pawtrack.com Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405646/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Hamill
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 15 June 2021 before Employment Judge Dawson, held by Cloud Video Platform, the tribunal recorded by consent that the respondent was in breach of contract in failing to pay the claimant’s expenses. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,916.65.
The written judgment makes clear that this decision did not determine any other breach of contract claim brought by the claimant. Those other breach of contract claims remained extant and unaffected by the judgment.
The record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. No other substantive claim outcome is determined in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | By consent, the tribunal recorded that the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay the claimant’s expenses and ordered damages of £1,916.65. Paragraph 2 states that this judgment did not determine any other breach of contract claim, which remained extant and unaffected. | Upheld | — | £1,917 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,917
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.