Case 1405682/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cozzi v Buzz Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405682/2019
- Decision date
- 5 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cozzi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge J Bax on 5 October 2020. The written judgment records the claimant's continuous employment as beginning on 19 August 2018 and ending on 26 September 2019.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Mr Cozzi had more than two years' continuous employment for the purposes of section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record does not set out any further substantive liability finding or any monetary award.
The note at the end of the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written record therefore contains only the qualifying service finding and not a fuller explanation of any later stage of the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record only records a finding that the claimant had more than two years' continuous employment for the purposes of s.108 ERA 1996. No final liability or remedy outcome is stated in the written judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.