Mr D Halpin v Euro Car Parts Ltd — 2019

Case reference: 1405683/2019
Decision date: 19 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Roper Dated

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr D Halpin

Respondent

Euro Car Parts Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Mr D Halpin's unfair dismissal complaint against Euro Car Parts Ltd. It held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required at least two years' service for an unfair dismissal claim, and that the claimant had been employed for less than two years.

The tribunal also recorded that the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but he did not give an acceptable reason. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held that the claimant had less than two years' service, so he was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not provide an acceptable reason.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.