Case 1405696/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Norton v Dynamic Meals Limited T/A Jaxs Bar and Nightclub — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405696/2020
- Decision date
- 8 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Norton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr R Norton’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages was well founded and ordered Dynamic Meals Limited T/A Jaxs Bar and Nightclub to pay him £6,380 gross. It also found that his claim for accrued but untaken holiday was well founded and ordered payment of £1,172.12 gross.
In relation to the holiday claim, the judgment records that £451.88 had been deducted from the Claimant’s last pay in part payment towards an employer loan, and that this deduction was taken into account in the judgment. No separate remedy breakdown is given beyond the two gross sums ordered.
The claim for breach of contract in respect of notice did not proceed to determination because it was withdrawn by the Claimant and is recorded as dismissed upon that withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,380 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment notes that the Respondent had deducted £451.88 from the Claimant’s last pay towards an employer loan and that this was taken into account. | Upheld | — | £1,172 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim in respect of notice was dismissed following the Claimant’s withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,552
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.