Case 1405705/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405705/2023
- Decision date
- 13 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss I Sultana, brought a race discrimination claim against Welsh Ministers after the termination of her loan agreement. The tribunal found that the acts relied on all occurred no later than 10 November 2022, so the ordinary three-month limitation period expired on 9 February 2023. ACAS early conciliation did not begin until 26 September 2023, and the claim was presented on 30 October 2023, about eight months out of time.
The claimant argued that her mental health difficulties meant it was not reasonably possible to bring the claim sooner. The tribunal accepted that the termination of the loan agreement had affected her mental health and that she later needed medication and counselling, but it found no medical evidence that she was unable to present proceedings in time. It also noted that she remained at work with HMRC, took no certified sick leave, and was able to prepare and pursue detailed grievance and appeal correspondence during the relevant period.
Applying the just and equitable test under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010, and referring to authorities including Robertson, Keeble, Morgan, Adedeji, Caston and Haque, the tribunal held there was no good reason why the claim could not have been brought within time. It also considered prejudice and found some forensic prejudice to the respondent because the claimant had not raised her complaints as discrimination at the grievance stage, so the respondent had not investigated them on that basis.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant had not shown that it would be just and equitable to extend time. Her claim was therefore dismissed in full as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held the discrimination claim was presented out of time. It refused to extend time on the just and equitable basis and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- section 123(1) Equality Act 2010 just and equitable extension
- section 140B Equality Act 2010 early conciliation
- Robertson v Bexley Community Service
- British Coal v Keeble
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston
- Luton Borough Council v Haque
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.