Case 1405708/2023 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v - Ms P Hall (solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405708/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent from 30 May 2023 until 6 September 2023, having resigned on 31 August 2023. His claim, presented on 31 October 2023, concerned three days' pay said to be outstanding for 30 and 31 May 2023 and 1 September 2023, quantified in his schedule of loss at £251.97. The respondent initially defended the claim, but by 3 January 2024 it accepted the sum was owed and paid it. It also paid interest on 17 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages arising from unpaid wages for 30 and 31 May 2023 and 1 September 2023. The respondent paid the £251.97 claimed by 3 January 2024 and interest on 17 January 2024, and the tribunal held no further award was within jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Alternative statutory claim based on the same arrears of pay. By the hearing no sum remained outstanding, and the tribunal held there was no jurisdiction to award further compensation for delay, defence of the claim, or the respondent's conduct. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 76(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- rule 76(1)(b) Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- AQ Ltd v Holden 2012 IRLR 648
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.