Case 1405711/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Guiver v MB Aerospace Newton Abbot Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405711/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Guiver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 15 September 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued and that tribunal orders had not been complied with. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 24-25 November 2021 did not take place. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the underlying unfair dismissal complaint or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the letter dated 15 September 2021 seeking reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued and for non-compliance with tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.