Case 1405722/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Noor v Kerdos International Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405722/2023
- Decision date
- 9 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Noor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 14 November 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,806.13 gross. The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,806.13.
The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,612.26 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Award stated as £1,806.13 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,806 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £1,806.13 awarded. Determined under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,806 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,612
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.