Case 1405724/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Z Chibwana (1) Dr B Rizvi (2) Dr S Mukhtar (3) v Isle of Wight NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1405724/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr Z Chibwana (1) Dr B Rizvi (2) Dr S Mukhtar (3)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a record of a preliminary hearing in Southampton on 13 October 2025, Employment Judge Self dealt with claims brought by Dr Z Chibwana, Dr B Rizvi and Dr S Mukhtar against Isle of Wight NHS Trust. Drs Chibwana and Rizvi were represented by counsel, Dr Mukhtar did not attend but sent written representations, and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal ordered that all claims for all claimants be struck out under Rule 38(1)(b), (c), (d) and/or (e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The record does not set out any substantive liability findings or any monetary award, and it records that the judgment was sent to the parties on 30 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text states only that all claims for all claimants were struck out; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment text states only that all claims for all claimants were struck out; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment text states only that all claims for all claimants were struck out; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text states only that all claims for all claimants were struck out; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment text states only that all claims for all claimants were struck out; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(b), (c), (d) and/or (e) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.