Case 1405740/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Genesis Chacin v Mr Ghulam Narimani — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405740/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Genesis Chacin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video at Southampton on 29 June 2021 before Employment Judge Fowell, with both parties appearing in person. The claimant, Miss Genesis Chacin, brought a complaint under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for failure to pay holiday pay against the respondent, Mr Ghulam Narimani.
The tribunal upheld the working time complaint and awarded the claimant £524.48. It also found a further unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £94.87. The judgment records that the total amount due to the claimant was £619.35.
No separate apportionment of the overall total beyond the two stated sums is recorded in the written judgment. The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Complaint under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for failure to pay holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £524 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a further unlawful deduction from wages in this sum. | Upheld | — | £95 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £619
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.