Case 1405792/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Leanne Chew v AND Ministry of Defence — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405792/2020
- Decision date
- 9 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Leanne Chew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting in chambers at Plymouth on 25 October 2021 before Employment Judge N J Roper, dealt with a preliminary issue on the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal held that Ms Leanne Chew had insufficient qualifying employment to pursue an unfair dismissal claim under section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment records that this decision did not affect the claimant’s remaining claims for discrimination on the grounds of her disability, which were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant had insufficient qualifying employment to pursue an unfair dismissal claim under section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that this did not affect the claimant’s remaining claims for discrimination on the grounds of disability. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.