Case 1405794/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Cunane v Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405794/2020
- Decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Cunane
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr David Cunane brought an unfair dismissal claim only. In the liability judgment sent on 10 May 2022, Employment Judge Dawson held that he had been unfairly dismissed by the Royal National Lifeboat Institution. The tribunal recorded that the question of remedy was adjourned to 7 June 2022, so this judgment does not contain any monetary award.
RNLI accepted that it dismissed the claimant but relied on some other substantial reason, described as a breakdown of trust and confidence. The dismissal letter relied on eight matters, including team morale, management style, onboarding of a new starter, the claimant’s resignation and retraction, and his engagement with improvement measures. The tribunal held that, in substance, those matters were allegations of incapability or misconduct rather than SOSR, and that RNLI had used the label of loss of trust and confidence instead of addressing the issues as conduct or capability concerns.
In the alternative, the tribunal held that dismissal was not justified under s.98(4) ERA 1996. It found that the claimant had been described in a contemporaneous RADAR appraisal as doing the job well in December 2019, although his performance had begun to deteriorate from around September or October 2019 and there had been poor morale in the team. The tribunal said RNLI should have provided a clear statement of shortcomings, support to improve, a proper reviewed performance process, and consideration of a return to the investigator role, and it declined any Polkey reduction because it was not satisfied the outcome would necessarily have been the same.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability judgment only; remedy was adjourned to 7 June 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- some other substantial reason (SOSR)
- band of reasonable responses
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd
- Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews
- Leach v Office of Communications
- A v. B [2010] IRLR 844
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.