Case 1405858/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Lee v Greens H2O hire Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405858/2023
- Decision date
- 8 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 14 November 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal determined that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £1,700 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It awarded £442 for that element.
The total amount awarded to the claimant was £2,142.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £1,700. | Upheld | — | £1,700 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awards £442. | Upheld | — | £442 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,142
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.