Case 1405883/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Ibbotson of Counsel For the v Ms C Earnshaw (T/a Charity Earnshaw Home Care Agency) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405883/2023
- Decision date
- 20 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Ibbotson of Counsel For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Adedayo Ogunde worked for Ms Charity Earnshaw, trading as Charity Earnshaw Home Care Agency, from 21 April 2022 until his resignation took effect on 5 September 2023. The dispute concerned deductions from his final wages and an invoice the respondent raised after he gave notice. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had agreed the respondent could recover £600 of solicitors' fees connected with his visa application, but found no documentary evidence that he had agreed to the remaining office administration and training charges, and it rejected the respondent's attempt to justify those deductions as claimant-specific costs.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found unlawful deductions of £1,984.42. It reached that figure by taking the unpaid August 2023 wages of £1,795.54 and the unpaid September wages of £788.88, then deducting the conceded £600 solicitors' fee. The tribunal also found that the respondent had not dealt with the claimant's formal grievance, and it therefore applied a 20% uplift of £396.88 under section 207A TULR(C)A 1992 and the ACAS Code.
The tribunal further found that the respondent breached section 1 ERA 1996 because the initial written particulars did not include the scale or rate of remuneration required by section 1(4)(a). Although the claimant asked for four weeks' pay, the tribunal said there had been near compliance and a written contract was in place, so it limited the section 38 Employment Act 2002 award to two weeks' pay of £1,117.96. Separately, it found a failure to provide accurate payslips and awarded £250 under section 12(4), less than the £750 sought. The total award was £3,749.26.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions of £1,984.42 after allowing the claimant's conceded £600 solicitors' fee, and added a 20% uplift of £396.88 because the respondent did not deal with the claimant's grievance. | Upheld | — | £2,381 |
| Other | The tribunal found the written statement of initial employment particulars did not include the scale or rate of remuneration required by section 1(4)(a) ERA 1996 and limited the section 38 Employment Act 2002 award to two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,118 |
| Other | The tribunal found a failure to provide accurate payslips and awarded £250 under section 12(4) ERA 1996, after the claimant had sought £750. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,749
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 1(4)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- section 12(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 207A(2) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice 1 on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.