Case 1405884/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Brzeska v Daysbright Limited and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405884/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms J Brzeska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol, by VHS, on 1 July 2021, Employment Judge Bax recorded a short disposal judgment in Ms J Brzeska v Daysbright Ltd and Others. The written record states that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No findings on the merits of the underlying complaints are set out in the judgment.
The record contains no monetary award or remedy. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. It does not separately identify the legal label for the withdrawn complaints, but the case listing categories were breach of contract and unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claims against the Second and Third Respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. It does not separately identify the legal label for the withdrawn complaints, but the case listing categories were breach of contract and unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.