Case 1405903/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Webb v Xardin Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405903/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Webb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr G Webb, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Xardin Limited. The tribunal recorded a judgment that the claim was struck out.
In its reasons, the tribunal said that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. It found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years, so he was not entitled to bring these proceedings. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but had failed to give an acceptable reason.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant complained of unfair dismissal. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring the proceedings. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.