Case 1405908/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Mr T S Lander v Yeomans Limited Heard on the papers — 2021

Case reference: 1405908/2020
Decision date: 30 July 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge O’Rourke

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr T S Lander

Respondent

Yeomans Limited Heard on the papers

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant applied to withdraw his claims of constructive unfair dismissal and discrimination/victimisation on grounds of age and/or disability, but asked for permission to reserve the right to bring further claims later because of his medical condition. The tribunal dealt with the application on the papers. It recorded that the claimant remained pursing a separate unlawful deduction from wages claim listed for hearing on 8 December 2021.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	Dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52; the claimant had sought to reserve the right to bring a further claim later on medical grounds.	Dismissed	—	—
Age discrimination	Grouped in the judgment with the disability discrimination and victimisation claims and dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52.	Dismissed	Age	—
Disability discrimination	Grouped in the judgment with the age discrimination and victimisation claims and dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Victimisation	Grouped in the judgment with the constructive unfair dismissal and age/disability discrimination claims and dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.