Case 1405910/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr M Brown, Owner — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405910/2020
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Jessica Rendle, was the manager of the respondent's hair salon and resigned on 21 July 2020 after the salon had reopened following the covid-19 closure. The tribunal proceeded despite the parties' failure to comply with earlier case management directions, without a common paginated bundle or witness statements, and decided the case on the oral and documentary material that was available.
The claimant's final payslip, dated 5 August 2020, showed basic pay for 64.5 hours and furlough pay for the period before reopening, but also deducted overpaid holiday hours and a training allowance, leaving a negative gross figure and no pay for July 2020. The tribunal accepted the agreed evidence that the claimant's pre-pandemic weekly pay was £379.60 and that, for the three weeks from 1 to 21 July 2020, the starting point for hours worked was £1,138.80 gross.
The tribunal found that the respondent was entitled under clause 6.11 of the contract to deduct overpaid annual holiday pay. On the parties' agreed figures, 2.5 weeks of holiday had been overpaid, valued at £949 gross, leaving £189.80 gross due to the claimant. It rejected the respondent's attempt to deduct £395.20 for training costs because there was no specific receipt or other proof that the cost related to training provided to the claimant within the relevant contractual period. The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay £189.80 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £189.80. The reasons also refer to holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and to the respondent's attempted training deduction, but no separate monetary award was made for those points. | Upheld | — | £190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £190
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.