Case 1405918/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Hannah McCoy v Retro Care Recruitment Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405918/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Hannah McCoy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Hannah McCoy's claim of sex discrimination against Retro Care Recruitment Limited succeeded. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The written record in the extracted text is brief and records the outcome and compensation awarded, but does not set out detailed written reasons.
The tribunal awarded £713.47 for a shortfall in August wages, £2,140.38 for lost salary from dismissal for September, and £6,625.00 for lost salary from dismissal for November 2019 to February 2020. It also awarded £5,000.00 for injury to feelings. Interest was awarded at £176.59 on financial losses and £186.30 on injury to feelings, and the total award was recorded as £14,841.75.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The listed monetary components in the extracted text sum to £14,841.74, while the judgment records a total award of £14,841.75. | Upheld | Sex | £14,842 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,842
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,479
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.