Case 1405920/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J King v Virginia Sheila Storey t/a Eco Angels — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405920/2020
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Southampton Employment Tribunals on 7 November 2020. The respondent, Virginia Sheila Storey t/a Eco Angels, failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Midgley therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without the listed hearing taking place.
The tribunal held that the claims for redundancy pay, notice pay and unpaid annual leave were well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay Mrs J King £2,887.50 in redundancy pay, £1,750.00 in notice pay, and £268.19 in holiday pay. The judgment does not set out any further factual reasoning beyond the rule 21 default procedure and the list of sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,888 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as 'notice pay' and does not further classify the legal basis. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as 'unpaid annual leave' and does not further elaborate. | Upheld | — | £268 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,906
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.