Case 1405929/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Mace v CPM Management Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1405929/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Mace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Mace brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against CPM Management Ltd. Employment Judge Gray held that the claim could not proceed because section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' qualifying service and the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but she did not give an acceptable reason. The judgment therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. It also stated that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and did not meet the qualifying period in section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.